2-Piece vs 3-Piece Ball Valve
Ball valve bodies are manufactured in one-piece, two-piece, or three-piece configurations. The choice affects maintenance access, in-line serviceability, cost, and suitability for different piping applications.
When to Use Each Design
A 2-piece ball valve has a body split into two halves joined at a single bolted or threaded connection. The ball and one seat are inserted from one end before the halves are assembled. This design offers a good balance of cost and reliability for permanent installations where in-line maintenance is not expected.
A 3-piece ball valve has a central body section containing the ball and seats, plus two end pieces (end caps) that connect to the piping. The end caps can be left in the pipe while the center section is unbolted and removed for maintenance. This is the go-to design when regular seat or ball replacement is anticipated.
Specifications and Comparison
| Parameter | 2-Piece Ball Valve | 3-Piece Ball Valve |
|---|---|---|
| Body sections | Two halves (one joint) | Center body + two end caps (two joints) |
| In-line maintenance | No (must remove entire valve) | Yes (remove center section, leave end caps) |
| Seat replacement | Requires piping disassembly | Center section removed between flanges |
| Leak paths | One body joint | Two body joints |
| Connections | Threaded, socket weld, butt weld, flanged | Threaded, socket weld, butt weld, flanged |
| Typical sizes | 1/4” to 4” | 1/4” to 4” (some up to 6”) |
| Pressure rating | Up to Class 2500 (1500 psi WOG common) | Up to Class 2500 (1500 psi WOG common) |
| Body materials | A105 (forged CS), A182 F316 (SS), brass | A105, A182 F316, A182 F51 (duplex) |
| Cost | Lower | 15-25% higher than 2-piece |
| Weight | Lighter | Heavier (more material at joints) |
| Standards | API 608, ASME B16.34 | API 608, ASME B16.34 |
Comparison with One-Piece Design
A one-piece (monolithic) ball valve has the entire body cast or forged as a single unit. The ball is installed during manufacturing, and there is no body joint or seam. This eliminates external leak paths but makes field maintenance impossible. One-piece designs are used for low-cost, non-critical applications (utility water, compressed air) and are rarely specified for oil and gas process piping.
| Body Type | Leak Paths | In-Line Service | Cost | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-piece | Zero | No | Lowest | Utility, non-critical |
| Two-piece | One joint | No | Medium | Process piping, permanent installation |
| Three-piece | Two joints | Yes | Highest | Frequent maintenance, clean service |
Selection Guidelines
For permanent installations in refineries and gas plants where valves are not expected to be serviced in place, 2-piece ball valves offer the best cost-to-reliability ratio. For pharmaceutical, food-grade, clean chemical, or instrument applications where periodic cleaning or seat replacement is required, 3-piece ball valves justify the added cost.
Both 2-piece and 3-piece designs are available as floating or trunnion mounted and in full bore or reduced bore configurations.
Leave a Comment
Have a question or feedback? Send us a message.