What Is EXW? Ex Works Shipping Term
EXW (Ex Works) is an Incoterms 2020 trade term that places the minimum obligation on the seller. Under EXW, the seller makes the goods available at their premises (factory, warehouse, or mill). The buyer bears all costs and risks from that point forward—including loading, inland transport, export clearance, freight, insurance, import clearance, and delivery to the final destination.
EXW represents the “naked” price of the goods. Every logistics cost is the buyer’s responsibility.
EXW Cost and Risk Allocation
| Responsibility | Seller | Buyer |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing and packaging | Yes | No |
| Loading onto buyer’s truck | No (buyer’s risk) | Yes |
| Export customs clearance | No | Yes |
| Inland transport to port | No | Yes |
| Origin port handling | No | Yes |
| Sea freight | No | Yes |
| Marine insurance | No | Yes |
| Destination port handling | No | Yes |
| Import customs clearance | No | Yes |
| Inland transport to site | No | Yes |
EXW Pricing Example
A purchase of 300 tons of ASTM A106 Gr. B seamless pipes from a mill in Cangzhou, China:
| Cost Element | Party | Amount (USD/ton) |
|---|---|---|
| Mill price (EXW Cangzhou) | Seller | 1,750 |
| Loading at mill | Buyer | 10 |
| Inland transport to Tianjin port | Buyer | 45 |
| Export customs clearance | Buyer | 15 |
| Port handling and loading | Buyer | 30 |
| Sea freight to Jubail | Buyer | 110 |
| Marine insurance | Buyer | 12 |
| Destination port handling | Buyer | 40 |
| Import customs clearance | Buyer | 20 |
| Inland transport to project site | Buyer | 35 |
| Total landed cost | 2,067 |
The $317/ton gap between EXW and landed cost demonstrates why comparing EXW quotes against FOB or CIF quotes without normalization produces misleading results.
Practical Limitations of EXW
EXW has significant practical drawbacks for international piping material procurement:
| Issue | Problem | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Export clearance | Buyer must clear exports in the seller’s country. Foreign buyers often cannot act as exporter of record | Use FCA instead—seller handles export clearance |
| Loading risk | Buyer bears risk during loading at seller’s premises, but has no control over the loading operation | FCA shifts loading responsibility to seller |
| No transport document | Seller has no obligation to provide a bill of lading or transport document | Under FOB/CIF, seller must provide B/L |
| Tax complications | In some countries, EXW includes domestic VAT that the foreign buyer cannot recover | FCA or FOB pricing may exclude VAT for export goods |
EXW vs FCA vs FOB
| Aspect | EXW | FCA | FOB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seller’s delivery point | Seller’s premises | Named place (carrier) | On board vessel |
| Loading | Buyer | Seller | Seller |
| Export clearance | Buyer | Seller | Seller |
| Inland transport | Buyer | Depends on named place | Seller (to port) |
| Transport mode | Any | Any | Sea only |
| Risk transfer | At seller’s door | At carrier | On board vessel |
When EXW Makes Sense
EXW is appropriate in limited scenarios:
| Scenario | Why EXW Works |
|---|---|
| Domestic purchases | Buyer and seller in same country; no export/import clearance needed |
| Buyer has own trucks at mill | Buyer picks up goods directly from factory |
| Price benchmarking | EXW reveals the true manufacturing cost without logistics markup |
| Back-to-back trading | Trader needs the base price to add own margins and logistics |
For international EPC piping procurement, FOB and CIF remain the dominant terms. For the complete Incoterms 2020 definitions and shipping documents required under each term, see the detailed guides.
Leave a Comment
Have a question or feedback? Send us a message.