LEL and UEL for Flammable Gases Explained

Quick Reference

LEL (Lower Explosive Limit) = minimum gas concentration that can ignite (mixture is “too lean” below this) UEL (Upper Explosive Limit) = maximum gas concentration that can ignite (mixture is “too rich” above this) Explosions occur only when gas concentration is between LEL and UEL, with maximum force at the midpoint.

LEL and UEL for Flammable Gases

The three conditions required for an explosion:

1. Fuel – Combustible gas at proper concentration (between LEL and UEL)
2. Oxygen – Sufficient O₂ to support combustion
3. Ignition source – Spark, flame, or heat

Flammability Concepts

Term	Definition
Ignition Point	Temperature at which material ignites and continues burning
Flash Point	Lowest temperature at which liquid forms ignitable vapor
Flammable Range	Concentration range (LEL to UEL) where gas/vapor can ignite
NFPA 704	Fire diamond rating system (0-4, where 4 = severe hazard)

Why LEL/UEL Matter

Application	How LEL/UEL Knowledge Helps
Safety	Control gas concentration within safe limits
Monitoring	Set alarms to trigger before LEL is reached
Process Control	Maintain reactions within non-explosive limits
Emergency Response	Assess explosion risk during leaks

Alarm Threshold

Gas detectors typically alarm at 20% of LEL to provide a safety margin before the explosive range is reached.

Pro Tip

Position LEL detectors based on gas density - install sensors low for heavier-than-air gases (propane, butane, H₂S) and high for lighter-than-air gases (hydrogen, methane). Getting this wrong means your alarm won’t trigger until gas has already accumulated to dangerous levels at breathing height.

Lower Explosive Limit (LEL)

LEL is the minimum gas concentration (% by volume) that can ignite. Example: Methane LEL = 5% means concentrations below 5% are too lean to burn.

LEL Detection Methods

Method	Principle	Pros	Cons
Catalytic (Pellistor)	Oxidizes gas on heated catalyst; measures temperature change	Broad-spectrum; most common	Can be poisoned by certain substances
Infrared (IR)	Measures IR absorption by gas	Not susceptible to poisoning; works without O₂	Some gases don’t absorb IR well
Electrochemical	Measures current from electrode reaction	Highly selective; accurate for specific gases	Affected by temperature/humidity
Semiconductor	Gas changes electrical resistance	Sensitive to low levels	Requires calibration; temp/humidity sensitive
PID	Ionizes gas molecules; measures current	Excellent for VOCs; sub-LEL detection	Effectiveness varies by gas
Ultrasonic	Detects acoustic leak signature	Early leak detection; outdoor use	Indirect measurement

Field Note

Catalytic bead sensors need regular bump testing and calibration - I’ve seen detectors in the field that showed “0% LEL” while sitting in a 10% LEL atmosphere because the sensor was poisoned by silicones or lead compounds. Bump test at the start of every shift in hazardous areas; a green LED doesn’t mean the sensor works.

Factors Affecting LEL

Factor	Effect on LEL
Higher temperature	Lowers LEL (more volatile)
Higher pressure	Lowers LEL (denser gas)
Enriched oxygen	Lowers LEL (easier combustion)
Depleted oxygen	Raises LEL
High humidity	Generally raises LEL (dilutes gas)
Inert gas presence	Raises LEL (dilution)
Poor ventilation	Increases risk of reaching LEL

Upper Explosive Limit (UEL)

UEL is the maximum gas concentration (% by volume) that can ignite. Above UEL, the mixture is too rich (insufficient oxygen). Example: Methane UEL = 15%.

UEL Detection Methods

Same technologies as LEL (catalytic, IR, electrochemical) but calibrated for higher concentrations. Additional methods:

• Gas chromatography – Laboratory-grade precision; not real-time
• Thermal conductivity sensors – Detect thermal changes at high concentrations
• Paramagnetic O₂ sensors – Detect oxygen depletion (indirect UEL indication)

Factors Affecting UEL

Factor	Effect on UEL
Higher temperature	Raises UEL (more vapor pressure)
Higher pressure	May raise UEL (density effects)
Enriched oxygen	Raises UEL (supports richer mixtures)
Depleted oxygen	Lowers UEL
High humidity	Raises UEL (dilution/heat absorption)
Inert gas presence	Raises UEL (dilution)
Higher altitude	Pressure effects on UEL

LEL vs. UEL Comparison

Aspect	LEL (Lower Explosive Limit)	UEL (Upper Explosive Limit)
Definition	Minimum concentration to ignite	Maximum concentration to ignite
Below limit	Too lean to burn (safe)	N/A
Above limit	N/A	Too rich to burn (safer, but can dilute to explosive range)
Between limits	EXPLOSIVE RANGE	EXPLOSIVE RANGE
Detection	Common; early warning systems	Less common; high-concentration processes
Management	Ventilation, monitoring, eliminate ignition sources	Ensure adequate O₂, prevent stratification

Above UEL Is Not Safe

Concentrations above UEL won’t ignite directly, but gas dilution (from ventilation, air movement, or dispersion) can bring concentrations back into the explosive range. Never assume “too rich” means safe.

Common Mistake

Relying on a single point gas detector for confined space entry. Gas concentrations stratify - LEL might be zero at detector height but explosive at the bottom of a tank or the top of a vessel. Always test multiple levels before entry and use continuous monitoring at the work location.

LEL UEL Chart by Gas Type

Below is a table showcasing the LEL and UEL values for some major flammable gases, presented as percentages by volume in air. These values are crucial for understanding the explosive potential of these gases and ensuring safe handling in various environments.

Flammable Gas	LEL (%)	UEL (%)
Hydrogen	4.0	75.0
Methane (Natural Gas)	5.0	15.0
Propane	2.1	9.5
Butane	1.8	8.4
Ethylene	2.7	36.0
Acetylene	2.5	100.0
Ammonia	15.0	28.0
Carbon Monoxide	12.5	74.0
Hydrogen Sulfide	4.3	46.0
Gasoline Vapor	1.4	7.6
Ethanol (Alcohol)	3.3	19.0
Methanol	6.0	36.0
Isopropyl Alcohol	2.0	12.0
Ethylene Oxide	3.0	100.0
Propylene Oxide	2.0	37.0
Benzene	1.2	8.0
Toluene	1.1	7.1
Hexane	1.2	7.5
Pentane	1.4	7.8
Styrene	0.9	6.8

These values are generalized and can vary slightly under different conditions of temperature and pressure. They serve as critical references for ensuring safety measures are in place to prevent the risk of fire or explosion when working with these gases.

Related Articles

Safety at Site

• Nitrogen Risks and Mitigation - Hazards of nitrogen in industrial environments and safety protocols

Testing and Inspection

• Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Types - Overview of NDT methods for piping inspection
• Hydrostatic Test - Procedures for pressure testing piping systems