Payment Terms: Cash, D/P, D/A, L/C
Types of Payment Terms
| Term | Risk to Seller | Risk to Buyer | Bank Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash in Advance | Lowest | Highest | Wire transfer only |
| Letter of Credit | Low | Low-Medium | Issues payment guarantee |
| Documentary Collection (D/P) | Medium | Medium | Holds documents until payment |
| Documentary Collection (D/A) | Higher | Lower | Holds documents until acceptance |
| Open Account | Highest | Lowest | None |
Cash in Advance
Most secure for sellers; highest risk for buyers. Seller dispatches goods only after receiving full (or partial) upfront payment via wire transfer (TT payment).
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| TT payment | Telegraphic Transfer-electronic wire transfer, usually irrevocable |
| Common use | Stock products, expedited orders, urgent maintenance |
| Rare in projects | EPC contractors/end-users typically reject full cash in advance |
Buyer Risk Mitigation:
| Method | How It Works |
|---|---|
| Split payment | 20-30% advance + balance at shipping (proof: Bill of Lading) |
| Advance Payment Guarantee | Bank guarantee refunding advance if seller fails to deliver |
Open Account
Highest risk for sellers; most favorable for buyers. Supplier ships goods with payment due 30-90+ days later.
| When Used | Details |
|---|---|
| Established relationships | Long history of prompt payments |
| Power imbalance | Supplier has less bargaining power than buyer |
| Early payment discounts | 2/10 net 30 (2% discount if paid in 10 days) |
Seller Risk Mitigation:
| Method | How It Works |
|---|---|
| Credit insurance | Protects against buyer insolvency/default (not payment disputes) |
| Partial advance | Request downpayment, especially for bespoke goods |
| Upgrade terms | Propose documentary collection or LC (often rejected by large buyers) |
Documentary Collection (D/P and D/A)
Banks facilitate document/payment exchange but do not guarantee payment. The seller ships goods, then submits shipping documents to their bank with collection instructions.

| Term | Also Called | Documents Released When | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| D/P | CAD (Cash Against Documents) | Buyer pays | Lower for seller |
| D/A | Documents Against Acceptance | Buyer accepts time draft | Higher for seller |
Workflow:
- Seller ships goods → submits documents + collection order to bank
- Seller’s bank (Remitting Bank) forwards to buyer’s bank (Collecting Bank)
- Collecting Bank releases documents upon payment (D/P) or acceptance (D/A)
- Payment remitted to seller

D/P vs. D/A:
| Aspect | D/P (Documents Against Payment) | D/A (Documents Against Acceptance) |
|---|---|---|
| Payment timing | Immediate | Deferred (30-90+ days) |
| Seller risk | Lower-payment before release | Higher-goods released before payment |
| Buyer cash flow | Strained | Preserved |
Advantages over LC:
- Lower cost and complexity
- Doesn’t use buyer’s credit lines
- Faster process (minimal bank involvement)
Payment terms range from maximum seller security (cash in advance) to maximum buyer security (open account). Letters of Credit provide bank-guaranteed payment upon document presentation, enabling “trustless” transactions where parties do not need a prior relationship. About 70% of first LC presentations are rejected for discrepancies; always compare every LC requirement against your actual capability to produce compliant documents before shipping.
Letter of Credit (L/C)
A Letter of Credit is a bank guarantee of payment to the seller upon presentation of compliant documents. The issuing bank (buyer’s bank) commits to pay the beneficiary (seller) when document requirements are met.
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| L/C or LC | Letter of Credit (US/Asia terminology) |
| D/C | Documentary Credit (European terminology) |
| UCP 600 | ICC rules governing LC transactions (current version since 2007) |
Why Use LC? Enables “trustless” transactions-parties don’t need prior relationship because bank guarantees payment.

LC Workflow:
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1. Agreement | Buyer and seller agree to LC payment |
| 2. Application | Buyer requests LC from their bank (issuing bank) |
| 3. Issuance | Issuing bank creates LC with terms and required documents |
| 4. Notification | LC sent to seller’s bank (advising bank) |
| 5. Confirmation | (Optional) Seller’s bank adds its guarantee |
| 6. Shipment | Seller ships goods per LC terms |
| 7. Presentation | Seller presents documents to bank |
| 8. Examination | Bank verifies documents comply with LC |
| 9. Payment | Issuing bank pays upon compliant presentation |
Types of Letters of Credit
| LC Type | Description | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| At Sight | Payment upon compliant document presentation | Standard trade |
| Usance/Time | Payment deferred (30-180 days after presentation) | Buyer needs payment terms |
| Confirmed | Second bank (in seller’s country) adds its guarantee | Issuing bank/country risk concern |
| Transferable | Original beneficiary can transfer to secondary beneficiary | Intermediary/trader transactions |
| Back-to-Back | Use export LC to obtain import LC from own bank | Trading without capital |
| Standby (SBLC) | Guarantee-only drawn if applicant defaults | Performance bonds, bid bonds |
| Revolving | Auto-reinstates after each drawing | Repeat shipments |
Confirmed LC

A confirming bank (usually in seller’s country) adds its guarantee to the LC. The seller receives payment even if the issuing bank or buyer fails.
Use when: Concerns about issuing bank creditworthiness or buyer’s country political/economic risk.
Transferable LC

Allows the original beneficiary to transfer all or part of the LC to secondary beneficiaries. Requires buyer’s explicit consent in the original LC.
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Partial | Only portion transferred; original beneficiary retains balance |
| Full | Entire LC transferred to secondary beneficiary |
Back-to-Back LC

The trader uses their “export LC” (from end-user) as security to obtain an “import LC” (to their supplier) from their own bank-without using own capital.
| LC | Parties |
|---|---|
| Export LC (Main) | End-user → Trader |
| Import LC (Secondary) | Trader → Supplier |
Conditions: Trader has solid bank relationship, export LC from reputable bank, supplier accepts LC, terms match except price.
Risk Summary

Related Articles
Trade Finance
- Factoring, Forfaiting, and Invoice Discounting - Converting receivables to cash
- HS Codes for Piping - Customs classification codes
Procurement and Logistics
- Common Shipping Documents - Documents required for LC presentation
- Incoterms 2020 - Delivery terms affecting LC requirements
- Common Contract Risks - Payment terms in supplier contracts
Leave a Comment
Have a question or feedback? Send us a message.
Previous Comments
My customer want to buy mask in L/C at sight and my seller just accept T/T. can you solve this problem? the deal amount is $2 million.
We can provide masks on sight LC terms
Hello, We can sell you ffp3 masks lc payment on sight. http://www.mkmedicaltextile.com
Hello, We can work on the terms of your customer
Cash in advance is one of the most secure payment terms for sellers, and the least secure for buyers. But cash delivery is the best way to achieve trust from the customer and this is the way to develop the brand identity.
Hi I own a trading import export company. I have now my buyers place some orders to me and they want handle for them these orders. The orders coming round 3-5 M $USD from CHINESE TURKISH suppliers. I am looking someone who can offer me the instrument for payment terms open to suppliers L/C. If someone can do it contact with me immediately ! Thank you in advance ! Yaroslav Varakchuk E-mail : [email protected] Phone : WhatsApp 0042 077 6582241
I read this post your post is so nice and very informative post thanks for sharing this post.
1. I don't understand "Telegraph Transfer BZ 180 Days" and "Telegraph Transfer PEKAO SA 180 Days"! 2. What is the full form "BZ" & "PEKAO SA"? Please advice me & help. Thanks
For which Products sir ?